The New Face(book) of Currency

Unless you’re living under a rock somewhere in the Outback, you’ll know that Facebook went public on 18 May, with an initial value of $104 bn (that’s a 104 followed by 9 zeros), putting owner Mark Zuckerberg in danger of becoming the richest man in the world.  The reviews were mixed: I understand it had a weak opening, and the plot meandered a bit, but I don’t think Mark is worrying too much about that—he’s too busy trying to find a place to stash 104 billion dollars.

$104 billion!  And for what?

Does Facebook produce anything?  At the end of the working week can anyone in that company point to anything they did and say, “Look, we created that?”  Are they providing an essential service, beneficial enough that people will pay for it?  No.  The only thing Facebook does is get 900 million people to look at it every day, and because so many people are looking at it, advertisers are willing to pay Facebook handsomely to slap ads on their pages.

That is all Facebook is, a vehicle for advertising; they have no intrinsic value and yet they are making billions.  At least in Bill Gates’ case, what he produces allows people, like myself, to be more productive; software is still an intangible (you can’t take Excel out behind the barn, paint it red and set fire to it), but it provides a service valuable enough that people are willing to pay for the applications.  Can you imagine MS-Word being distributed for free, supported by advertising that pops up periodically or is embedded in the header bar?

Unfortunately, I can, and I shudder.

I shudder because I wonder if books could go the same way.  Might publishers soon become so desperate for revenue that they begin selling page space to advertisers?  It seems a logical move: books are—to one way of thinking—just one step away from magazines, and magazines exist primarily because of the glossy ads that appear on practically every page.  So the next bestselling novel is just an ad waiting to happen.  Also, I think eBooks would be well-suited to something like this, as people are more used to navigating around ads when they are reading things electronically.  Facebook, for example.

I’m not going to spend a lot of time worrying about this, mainly because I have enough on my plate as it is, but also because it is already happening.  Some books already come with ads in them (I’m talking about product ads here, not ads for the author’s next book, which don’t count) and although I have not yet seen an ad in an eBook, that doesn’t mean they don’t exist.  Or that they won’t soon.

Would this be a bad thing, though?

(Thinks about it for 5 seconds)

Yes.

To answer my own rhetorical question, I believe it would be bad: bad for writers, bad for readers, bad for society as a whole and good only for publishers who, in all likelihood, would not pass any of that goodness on.  Despite any initial promises to the contrary, I’m sure publishers would consider advertising dollars to be additional revenue, not alternate revenue, so don’t believe them if they tell you that ads will allow them to sell books at a reduced rate.  (Remember when cable TV came into being?  The hype stated that, because you paid for the service, the channels would be commercial-free.  How long did that last?)

As a reader, I would really object to leafing through ads while trying to read the latest thriller.  And as a writer, I would feel that my work was being sullied for the sake of a few shekels, and as a book-lover in general, I would be horrified to think that any collections of literature passed down in history from this point forward would be punctuated by tawdry advertisements for breath mints, home owner’s insurance and/or condoms.

But, again, I’m not going to worry about it; they will do what they will do.  It’s just that the power of advertising—via Facebook—got me thinking.  I just hope it hasn’t got the publishers thinking.

Posted in General Randomness | Tagged , | Leave a comment

WordPress or Blogger, Which is Better?

I’ve been using both Blogger and WordPress for the past few weeks in my preparation for abandoning WordPress ‘cause it done me wrong.  I’m sorta over my snit now and more interested in assessing the differences between these two very popular blog hosting sites.  I’m sure you’re all lying awake at night wondering, “Which blogging platform is Michael going to chose?” so I won’t keep you in suspense any longer.

But first, an assessment: choices, as we know, are not always based on logic, but deciding which of two options is best for your needs is simply a matter of critical comparison.  So which do I think is better?  WordPress.  Hands down.

I know you can’t judge a book by its cover, but this overview screen sets the tone and I think you’ll agree the WordPress screen looks more polished and professional.  That theme is carried on through the two systems.

Here’s my side-by-side comparison:

Feature WordPress Blogger Winner
Hidden Costs WordPress always has its hand out; if you want to do it, WordPress will charge you for it. Has none. Blogger
Posting Can copy and paste from Word with no issues.  The post’s HTML can be tinkered with easily. Copy and Paste from Word causes issues and the HTML is rendered unintelligible. WordPress
Pages Can easily create and manipulate. Can easily create; manipulating them is also easy but the means to do it was well-hidden. WordPress
Menus Multiple menus with multiple levels, easily maintained. Just a list of your pages, single level. WordPress
HTML Does not allow you to tinker with HTML or CSS without a fee Can do as you please for free. Blogger
Configuration If you want to configure your blog beyond the basics, it will cost you. Easily and completely configurable.  No Fee. Blogger
General Look and Feel I like WP’s smooth look and ease of access to stats and other features; the dashboard is sleek and user friendly. I like Blogger’s stats for some things, WPs for another; the Blogger Dashboard is clunky but easy to manage. This is a personal choice; I like some things in WP more and other things in Blogger more.  It’s a toss up.
Inexplicably alters the look of your blog without telling you and without providing the option of changing it back Did it once; that was enough. Never, so far, but I have been warned by others that I cannot always count on this. Blogger, for now, until they piss me off.

(Incidentally, above is how WordPress handles tables.)

So which one am I going to chose?  Neither, or more specifically, both.

Once the work of equalizing all the blogs was done (which, as I have mentioned before, was actually fairly quick and simple—something that might interest those of you wishing you hadn’t sold your soul to WordPress, or Blogger) I found myself with two fully functioning yet separate blog empires (sort of like Bizarro World in the Superman comics).

My hit stats in the Blogger Universe quickly outstripped those in the WordPress World but I still had a dedicated band of followers who remained behind (and, in some cases, probably were not even aware of the existence of the Blogger universe).  If I shut down one world I would inevitably cut off some followers, as I found to my dismay when I first switched to WordPress.

After a few attempts, I found dual updating to be a simple exercise that took only an extra minute or two.  So I decided a decision wasn’t necessary; I would simply keep both blogspheres going.

In a way, it is to my advantage: because of the idiosyncrasies of Blogger, the manipulations I had to go through to update a post were, initially, taking an inordinate amount of time.  The method I settled on, and which takes seconds instead of a quarter of an hour, is this: I copy and paste the completed post from Word into Worpress and insert any media.  Job done.  Then I copy and paste the WordPress post into Blogger—photos and all.  Job done.  It works a treat, but it is a bit ironic that I need WordPress to make Blogger posting simple.

Also Ironic is, now that the brouhaha is over, I find I sorta like the infinite scrolling, and am thinking about activating it on my blogs.

Go figure.

Posted in General Randomness | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

It’s My Website and I’ll Shill if I Want To

I wasn’t planning on pushing my book on this site because I somehow felt that violated my Twitocratic Oath and Passive Marketing ethos, but I does occur to me that my book does need some advertizing, and no one else is going to do it.

So here you go–an ad for my latest, and last, Postcards book.  Enjoy:

Postcards From Ireland is now on sale.  You can buy it at Amazon.comAmazon.UKKindle.comKindle.UKBarnes and Noble Nook or Smashwords.

Additionally, to help heighten the festivities, I am offering my first two books—Postcards From Across the Pond and the creatively titled More Postcards From Across the Pond—as 99-cent eBooks.  (This is a limited time offer, which means they will stay at that price until I can be arsed to change them back.)

And now I’m going to do something I expect you’ve never seen another writer do: I’m going to warn you off buying it.

If you are a fan of my first two books, then you will know they are books of hilarious essays about my life here in Britain.  And if you are expecting the third book to be a continuation of the first two, you would be mistaken.  It is not a collection of essays, but a linear narrative recounting my Ireland adventure from ten years ago.  This is not to say it isn’t funny; it is.  Even I had to laugh at my ten-year-old self when I was reminded of how hopelessly ill-prepared I was for a solo trip to Europe; in looking back, I am amazed I pulled it off without being killed or arrested.  But there is, in addition to the frivolity, a thread of romance, a revelation of my impressions about seeing my soon-to-be-wife for the first time and how I ended up in the very circumstances I had originally gone to Ireland to avoid.

So, if you’re looking for a book of essays, don’t buy it, but if you want a fun read about a clueless American let loose in Ireland, then you might enjoy it.  I hope you do, for I certainly enjoyed sharing the story with you, and finally getting the chronicle down fully and completely.

Posted in Marketing, Writing | Tagged , | Leave a comment

More About The Move

The story so far: I’m moving my blogs back to Blogger

The reason in parable form:

I rent a flat.  It’s mine.  I can do as I please here (okay, I can’t manufacture bombs or run a terrorism school but we’re talking within normal bounds).  This makes me feel comfortable and in control of my life, something I value highly.

I come home one day to find my furniture has been re-arranged while I was out.  Was I burgled by furniture movers?  Had I done this in my sleep?  I spend a few days worrying and wondering and then start asking the other tenants.

Seems the landlord has let himself into our flats, rearranged our furniture to his satisfaction and then made it so we can’t change it back.  He provided no notice that he was going to do this and left no message behind explaining what he had done or why.  So we confront him.

“Tough shit,” he says.  “This is how I want your flats to look and this is how they’ll stay.  And I’m going to do this to my other properties, as well.”

In the end, he relents and allows us to move our furniture back the way we want it.  Many grumble, some threaten to leave; as far as I know, I’m the only one who actually does.

By doing this, the landlord has demonstrated that my flat is not my flat.  It can be invaded and rearranged at any time.  I no longer feel comfortable; I am no longer in control.  In my mind, this is a huge thing, and it leaves me no choice but to go elsewhere; for me, there really is no other option.

So that’s why I’m doing what I’m doing, now for the nitty gritty of actually doing it.  I have to admit, when I made the announcement, I was worried that I had foolishly committed myself to a load of extra work, but in the end it was a doddle.

The reason I went to WordPress in the first place was because their blogs looked better and more professional.  But once I finally understood what I wanted my blogs to look like, it was a matter of two hours of enjoyable tinkering to turn my Blogger blogs into near exact duplicates of my WordPress blogs.

Wordpress Blog

Then all that remained was to copy the interim posts over so there wouldn’t be a huge gap in the Blogger blogs.  I was expecting that to be an onerous task but in reality it took about an hour.  Job done.

Blogger Blog

This leaves only one minor issue: my URLs.

The URLs for the WordPress blogs were bought through WordPress, so I can’t transfer them to my Blogger blogs yet.  I did find instructions on how to manually transfer the DNS but, as I cannot decipher them, I’ll have to wait until my 1-year sentence is up.  At that time, they will be released into the public domain and I can then buy them back through Blogger.  A bit dodgy, and it means I have to run two blog empires simultaneously, but that isn’t really much of a bother, either.

It is highly ironic that my move to WordPress was undertaken (with disastrous results) while my previous book was coming out, and that my move back to Blogger is happening (with, I hope, better results) just as I am releasing my new book.

When I abandoned my Blogger blog (because of something I read in a How-To book, which shows I really shouldn’t be reading so many How-To books) my hit rate fell from the thousands into the hundreds and has never recovered.  Oddly, I found that my old Blogger blogs—even though they have been abandoned for eight months—are still getting nearly as many hits as my active WordPress blogs, and in some cases they get even more traffic.

So I think, this time, I really am making the correct choice.  And if I keep both blogs running through this change-over period, I have that much greater chance of reaching potential readers.

And that can never be a bad thing.

Posted in General Randomness | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Anatomy of a Book

As you know (and if you don’t, you should really try harder to keep up) my original book, Postcards From Across the Pond was recently released from the publisher with the rights reverting back to me.  Naturally, I self-published it immediately.

I was, and remain, chuffed about this circumstance, but in all the excitement I neglected to spare a thought for the fact that this means I am no longer a published author.  I am just some guy who completed a manuscript and posted it to Kindle.

These are the books; one is the published edition, the other my edition:

Can you tell them apart?  I can’t.  It’s the exact same text, the same cover (used with permission) and the same format.  The only difference is the notation on the title page where my old publisher’s name is replaced with my own.  But suddenly, my local bookstore doesn’t want to know who I am.  They will no longer stock this book, or any of my other DIY efforts.

I have, it seems been relegated to “Indie” status.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, the only way I can think of to say “I self-published a book” without sounding chagrined is to follow it up with, “and I sold a shed-load of copies.”  That, it seems, is now my only option, so that is what I am going to have to try.

I have a number in mind—nothing excessive—that I think will add an edge of respectability to the venture.  I’m keeping that to myself for now, but I will let you know if my readers seem up to the challenge in the weeks to come.  Release day is in a week and a half.

Speaking of, the proof copy of Postcards From Ireland (the reason for all this brouhaha) arrived and it looks really good, especially when you consider that I made the cover myself.  The only jarring feature was the color of the pages.

I went with white on More Postcards because the original Postcards was published (by a real publisher) using white paper, but then I read a book on how to be a proper, professional-type self publisher and was assured that cream paper was the way to go because proper books were printed on cream paper.  And so I went with cream on the last book, fully anticipating going back and changing the others, until I saw the copy.

Bottom: my first book, Middle: my current book, Top: a real book

I think it was so jarring because the other two are stark white.  But for all that, they don’t look bad, or unprofessional.  Then I started looking around at other, property published books and found that some non-fiction books—such as collections of comical essays—were printed on white paper.  So, taking all that into account—and having gotten used to seeing the yellow-tinted pages of Postcards From Ireland, I have decided the best thing to do is to leave the first two books as they are—printed on white paper—and keep the new book, which is, after all, a story of sorts and therefore a better candidate for cream-colored paper, as it is.

And that’s a good thing because, at this point, I really don’t need to make any more work for myself.

Posted in Self-Publishing | Tagged | 2 Comments

WordPress: The Last Straw

*Prior to posting, an update already occurred and is posted at the bottom.  In my view it was too little too late and has not changed my mind, so this post, while a bit late, is still valid.

God help me, I’m moving my blogs again.

This time it isn’t my fault, or me running after something shinny and new; I don’t want to move, but I feel I must.  It’s a matter of principle, which is another way of saying I know it’s a daft thing to do but I’m doing it anyway.

WordPress and I never really saw eye-to-eye.  We had a brief flirtation back in the spring of 2009 but WordPress turned out to be what you might call a high-maintenance partner and I soon tired of it.

I went back to WordPress last year for one specific reason: I did not like the look of my Blogger blogs.

This was a problem I wrestled with for months but always came away from my time-consuming tinkering with the idea that the blogs still didn’t look quite…right.  And as I surfed the Blogsphere, I began to notice that every blog I liked the look of was a WordPress blog.  And then I read a book about self-publishing that said if you wanted to be a serious self-publisher you needed to get a WordPress blog because they looked more professional.  And I could not argue with that.

So I switched.

The first thing I found was that I couldn’t tinker behind the scenes the way I did in Blogger.  Then I discovered I could modify the CSS files and spent an afternoon learning CSS and once I got the blog looking right in the previews, I clicked SAVE.  Then, and only then, did a pop-up tell me I had to pay $30 a year for the privilege.  That sort of practice rankled me, but I pressed on.  A few months later, I finally figured out how to link a video to my blog posts.  A few weeks after that I attempted to link another one and a pop-up told me I had to pay $59.97 per year for the privilege.  I convinced myself that linking videos was a stupid idea and pressed on.

Then, this weekend I logged in to find my blog had changed.  I like my Postcards blog to have a single post showing on the front page, like an article, because the posts are articles.  I think it looks and read better and allows visitors to see the footer widgets.  But now ALL my posts appeared in a long line as if I had rolled them all out on toilet paper.  I spend hours checking my configurations and testing different settings.  When I ran out of options, I checked WordPress help, which was no help at all, and then I Googled it (Note to self: always, always, always go to Google first.)

Apparently, WordPress had decided, without telling us, to “enhance” our blogs with this new “feature” – a feature that does NOT contain an opt-out setting – and what did we think of it.

Well, hundreds told them what they thought, and all but one hated it.  At the very least, they argued, an opt-out option was necessary.  WordPress responded by ignoring their customers for two days then shutting down the complaint threads.  Their only statement on the subject, so far, has been a cheery, “Thanks for the feedback; we don’t care what you think so we’re going to roll this out to the rest of our customers, as well.”  (They initially did this on the Twenty-Ten and Twenty-Eleven themes—the theme I recently switched to, naturally.)

I was, and remain, gobsmacked.

The idea of moving back to Blogger seemed impossible at first, but I have not been gone that long so, in actuality, moving all my posts, notifying all my followers, swapping over the URLS and—this is the key component—making my Blogger blogs look like my WordPress blogs, shouldn’t be that huge a job.  So I’m going to do it.

In addition to no longer having to deal with a company that decides for me, and without notifying me, what my blog should look like and then forces their decision on me, I also receive the following perks:

Feature                        Free Blogger blog       Free WordPress blog

Code access                $0                                $30

Link Videos                $0                                $59.97

No Ads                       $0                                $29.97

Redirect                      $0                                $12

URL Hosting              $10                              $17

Additionally, if you want to access features on your chosen theme beyond the basic options, you often need to pay for an upgrade, which can run anywhere from $25 into the hundreds.

To get what I get in Blogger for $10 a year I have to pay at least $150 a year to WordPress.  For each blog.  And I have four blogs.

So hang on, we’re going for a ride; if I do this right, you shouldn’t feel too many bumps.

And, unlike WordPress, I’ll keep you updated.

=========================================

For those interested in what WordPress actually said, here is the complete test of both letters, their only word on this to date:

http://en.forums.wordpress.com/topic/to-infinity?replies=136

8 Feb 2012 [I have added my own comments because this is my blog and I can]:

In the quest to make visitors engage with your content as effortlessly as possible we are rolling out a new feature to your blog home pages—infinite scrolling! Instead of having to scroll and click through older-pages links we are now pulling new content automatically whenever a visitor approaches the bottom of a blog.

Best thing, it should be entirely transparent to you or your readers. The feature is enabled for blogs with the Twenty Ten or Twenty Eleven themes.

We take care of the smaller details, such as removing the older/next links, integrating with your design as smoothly as possible. Having said that, please let us know what you think by posting any feedback you may have. Thanks.

[Cue several hundred angry WordPress users telling them how they have just destroyed hours worth of work and begging for, if not a reversal, at least a way to opt-out.]

10 Feb 2012 [two days later]

Howdy guys, thanks for the feedback.

The initial usage stats from infinite scroll look really good — people are reading more posts which means they’re spending more time on your site. [Actually, this was the thousands of incredulous blog owners who, like me, kept scrolling through their blogs trying to figure out want was wrong.] As you might guess, people are way more likely to just scroll down than they were to click the “next page” button — it’s faster and better. [Who says it’s better?]  It’s the future of all web pages with more than one page of content. [Again, who decided this?]

We’re still working out some bugs, and as some of you noted your footer widgets are temporarily inaccessible, and figuring out the best way to deal with that and other edge cases.

A few people have asked if “everyone” is against this why we’re just not turning it off. Well, there’s a thread like this which seems overly negative for pretty much everything we launch. People don’t come to the forums to say they like something they usually come when they have a problem. [So, basically, you’re not believing what your users are telling you.] That’s why we ask for feedback on the forums, to find the problems, not to gauge popularity. For that we’ve learned to look at stats, what people do versus what they say. [If you don’t offer them a choice they have to do as you say even if they hate it.] This is better [Again, who decided this is better?] because it allows us to get feedback from millions of people in addition to the few thousand who frequent the forums. Both voices are important.

Thanks for your patience, and as we fix these issues up we’ll continue rolling out infinite scrolling [the plan was to roll it out to everyone all along, regardless of user feedback] to the rest of the themes that work with it. Also thank you to the people on the thread who provided calm, rational feedback without attacks or hyperbole. The team is always here for you.

13 Feb 2012 [I checked yesterday as I was writing this post and this update was not there at that time]

An update on infinite scroll: Thanks for your feedback and patience, everybody. If you’re using footer widgets to display content in your blog, you can now disable infinite scrolling by visiting your Reading settings, in your dashboard. We’re still working on improving the reading experience with infinite scroll, including how well it integrates with your themes and customizations.

Posted in Uncategorized | 13 Comments

The Twitocratic Oath

Lately, I’ve been thinking a lot about marketing.  This is what I have come up with:

The only way to sell your product—be it a book, a software program or crocheted condoms—is to tell people about it.  (Incidentally, I made up “crocheted condoms” as a joke, then Googled it on a whim.  Yup.  http://www.ravelry.com/patterns/library/condom  Heaven help us!)

The best way to get people to know about your product is to get other people to talk about it, spontaneously, for free and, hopefully (but not altogether necessary), in a good way.  That is something I consider achievable, if unlikely, but it harkens back to the Prime Directive of introducing people to your product in the first place.

You can do this by spending money or for free: no real choice to make there, then.

Fortunately, these days, there are numerous way to advertise for free: blogging, twitter, Facebook, YouTube…etc.  Due to my lack of specialized talents, however, I am limiting myself to blogging and Twitter.  (I really want to give YouTube a go, but I am not keen on embarrassing myself in front of 7 billion people, even though it would probably shift a lot of books.)

Blogging is my strong suit, but that gets you nowhere unless people are made aware of the blog, which leads back to Twitter.  (Guest blogging is another great publicity source but I have decided not to do that this time.  For my other books, people have kindly allowed me to do this but I feel I am incurring karma debt by not yet being in a position to reciprocate.  I am willing to help anyone who asks, but no one wants to guest post on my blog or solicit advice from me so, until that happens, I’m trying to keep my Karma Credit Card in my wallet.)

So, Twitter and commenting on other people’s blogs: both great ways to let people know you are out there.  However, I see a lot of people Twitting and commenting in ways that make me cringe; I want people to be aware of me, not think I’m a dick, so I came up with a list of rules for me to follow and I’m calling it my Twitocratic Oath because calling it my “Don’t Be a Dick” list sounded too snarky.

The original Oath; oddly, it was not published in eBook format.

The Twitocratic Oath

I swear by Twitter, WordPress, Blogspot and all other social networks, and I take to witness all the Cyber-gods and Cyber-goddesses, to keep according to my ability and my judgment, the following Oath and agreement:

  1. I will not blast hundreds of tweets at a time so that my followers will see only page after page of my tweets when they log on.
  2. I will make every effort to be sociable and accessible on Twitter and to interact with others.
  3. I will limit publicity Tweets to announcements about book releases, notifications of price changes, special offers or to draw attention to a review or other media appearance.
  4. I will post Tweets about my blog updates (or special announcements as noted in Item 3) no more than six times to Twitter (to cover all time zones) and only once to Facebook.
  5. I will post Tweets about past blog posts no more than twice a week.  (I have never done this, but it sounds a great idea and I want to leave the option open.)
  6. In reference to Item 4, my blog posts will be not be overt advertisements for my books (except in the case of announcements, as listed in Item 3) and will continue to provide the same, quality entertainment they always have.  In short, I want people to visit my blog because I can do something for them (i.e. entertain them) and if they like what they see and want to buy my books, all the better.
  7. I will comment appropriately on other people’s blogs and if I ever post a comment along the lines of, “Hey, great post! Reminds me of my book, Best Book Ever Written, available at (link), (link) and (link), where I mention something very similar…” I will go immediately to the nearest pig farm and dunk my head in the biggest pile of manure I can find because that is what I will deserve.

If I keep this oath faithfully, may I enjoy my life and practice my art, respected by all humanity and in all times; but if I swerve from it or violate it, may the reverse be my life.

Hippocrates: "Do no harm."

Do I expect to sell a lot of books following this oath?  Not really, but I do expect to be able to sleep soundly at night.

(Update:  I have just been  reminded–by a visit to Nicola Morgan’s site Help I Need a Publisher–about DMs, or Direct Messages in Twitter.  I didn’t mention them because I have never used them and don’t intend to.  I think that’s a good plan.)

Posted in General Randomness, Marketing | Tagged , , | 11 Comments

My Self-Publishing Manifesto

With the Postcards Trilogy put snugly to bed, it’s time to pose the question, “Now that you’re in the Self-Publishing Groove, are you going to self-publish your novels?”

The answer:

No.

There are many valid reasons to join forces with the self-publication beast, and many, many more specious rationalizations for taking its paw and skipping down the yellow-brick road with it.  That the decision to self-publish (or not) is fraught with writer-angst is made manifest by the nearly equal number of Why I Chose To (or Not To) Self-Publish posts that follow the decision.  Consider this just one more in the churning Sea of Rationalization.

My self-published Postcards series was a textbook case for self-publishing:

  1. do it yourself to see how hard it is
  2. get it professionally published to learn how it should be done
  3. keep the self-publishing option open in case the writer/publisher relationship breaks down

That’s all well and good and I am proud of the books and pleased with the results but I see my fiction work as something totally separate.  All my life I’ve wanted to be a published novelist, and I think I owe it to myself to not short-circuit that dream by slinging some sub-standard manuscript up on Kindle.

Patience has always been part of the game, but self-publishing appeals to our not-so-latent desire for immediate gratification; my manuscript shouldn’t be sitting with an agent, it should be up on Kindle right NOW so I can start reaping the rewards I so richly deserve.  And while I admit that the idea of my WIP sitting lonely and unloved on some publisher’s slush pile does make the siren call of self-publication appealing, it’s still not something I want to do.

Writer’s are in the absurd position of needing validation.  It’s ridiculous and unfair and causes us to put forward arguments like, “If a person paints, we call them an artist, if a person builds cabinets we call them a carpenter, ergo, if a person writes, they are an author.  Why do we need one of ‘The Big Six’ to bestow that title on us?”  And that is true.

The problem with this comparison, however, is that the writers are choosing who to compare themselves with.  What about actors?  Does practicing acting in your home make you an actor?  And if you met a person who claimed to be an actor who said to you, “I don’t believe in the antiquated model of auditioning for parts—I follow a new paradigm, so I’ve rented a hall and written my own play for me to star in.  Would you like to buy a ticket?  I have plenty left,” would you consider that person an actor, or a self-deluded wannabee doing something any idiot with more money than sense could do?

(Incidentally, what we learn from this is that self-published writers need to keep comparing themselves to artists and carpenters and if someone says, “But what about actors” it would be best to change the subject immediately.)

And so we arrive at the heart of the matter:  I don’t want to self-publish because, like the antics of the wannabee actor, anyone can do it.

Until a few years ago, aspiring to be a writer—a published author, someone who wrote a novel good enough to put between the covers of a book—was a noble ambition.  There was no shortage of people who said, “I could write a book,” but those who actually did it were few.  But now, anyone can; they can, their little brother can, their grandmother can, their great aunt Tilly can and, seemingly, they all are.  Having a book with your name on it these days is meaningless; the only thing that injects any significance into the phrase “I have a book out,” is if you can truthfully follow it up with “and I’ve sold a quarter million copies on Kindle” or “and it was published by (insert Big Name Publisher here).”

I’m not likely to sell a lot of books, so the only thing I can do to make saying “I have a book out” worthwhile is to secure a publishing contract.  Anything else would be a compromise and an admission of defeat.

Here’s hoping I won’t be back in six months admitting defeat.

Posted in Self-Publishing, Writing | Tagged , | 6 Comments

I Solemnly Swear

This past weekend, I went through my Postcards books and deleted the swear words.

This is something I have been thinking about for a while (ever since the final Postcards book was completed—but more on that in a moment) and I was not sure how I felt about it.  I’m still not sure how I feel about it, but it is done, and I believe it was the right decision.

The swear words included only the F-Bomb.  It’s a word I quite fancy, and one I use often; just ask my wife or my co-workers.  They will, however, (if interrogated deeply enough and choose to answer honestly) admit that I don’t use the word with quite the same alacrity as I used to.

Consequently, the first book had six instances of the Eff-Word, book two had three and the final installment has none at all.  More tellingly, the final book did have two but—despite them being used in context and for comic effect—they jarred with the rest of the text to the point where removing them was obviously the right thing to do.  I remain glad I did; the book reads much better because of it.

But what about the other two?  I always saw them as a set, so would having one book with no swear words fit in with the rest of the series even if the language wasn’t quite as—how shall I say—gentle?

Altering “completed” works is nothing new: Dickens’ two endings for Great Expectations is a notable literary example, Paul Simon went back, years later, to add another verse to The Boxer, and of course they painted clothing on the naked angels during the Middle Ages.  But is this right?  One of the great advantages of self-publication is this ability to alter the “finished” work at any time.  But just because we can, does that mean we should?  With this new-found freedom, can we now beta-test ending of our novels the way the film companies try out several different endings to some movies?  Will people buying a book in this brave new world now have to worry about buying it again because, in a year or so, it might be different?  And if that is to be the case, shouldn’t they be allowed to “upgrade” at no additional cost?

And will my books start appearing on eBay with the claim “Like New!  The original paperback, with the swear words!  £276.65”?

These were the questions that kept me of several minds while I was attempting to decide what to do with the nine “bad” words out the nearly 200,000 that make up the three books.  Strange how we choose to torment ourselves.

The reasons I decided to do it were individual to this piece of work, and I might not make the same decision on another book, but this is why I ultimately put myself through the hell of re-formatting and re-uploading a set of very similar books to multiple sites over the course of an exceedingly long, and dreadfully frustrating Friday:

  • The books, being part of a greater whole, need to be consistent, and instead of bringing the tone of the last one down, I chose to bring the tone of the other two up.
  • Although the first two books handled the profanity well, the final book changes the tone of the series, making hard profanity out of character.
  • Oddly, over the years, my sensibilities have changed to the point where I didn’t like the swear words in the text and—this being the pivotal point—they were MY books and I could do as I bloody well saw fit with them.

And so, future readers who buy the complete set of Postcards books, will be getting what is, for now, the final cut—a humorous, but profanity-free—romp through Ireland and life in Great Britain.

I just hope they appreciate all the fucking effort I went thought.

Posted in General Randomness, Self-Publishing, Writing | Tagged , | 4 Comments

Fun With Kindle

The good news is, I managed to upload both books to Kindle US, Kindle UK and Smashwords without too much difficulty.  The bad news is, there was difficulty.

There is no room for complaint, really; I did the formatting and cover tweaking for both books in the space of an afternoon and still managed to fit in a cigar break, so this should tell you how easy it is to upload an eBook (and why I get so incensed when I see people or companies charging hundreds or thousands of dollars for the “service”).  But easy as it is, it is not without pitfalls.

Take the cover for my original PC book.

After my publisher returned the rights and told me I was free to do as I wished with it (i.e. self-publish it), I wrote back and asked permission to use the cover.  He never answered.  So, assuming no response is as good as a “Yes” I nicked the cover.

The copyright gods must have been angry, however, because this is what I uploaded to Kindle:

And this is what appeared on Kindle:

Repeated uploads—using different graphics—yielded the same result.  Eventually, I managed to get one to “take” and it now looks as it should.  But it was a perplexing week, and a bit frustrating when you take into account that, after each upload, there was a delay of up to 24-hours before the book appeared and I could see if the cover was all right.

And then there was the matter of the font.

I used the same template I used for More Postcards and even copied all the text from the manuscript, pasted it into Notepad and then copied it into the template, effectively removing all of MS Word’s formatting.  But after setting the book up for Kindle and Smashwords and uploading them, both versions came out in Arial font.

Now, Arial is a fine font, and each version looks fine and reads okay in that font, but it is not the font I formatted the book in, and it is not the font I uploaded.  The fact that they both turned to Arial tells me there is something wrong in the template, but I cannot imagine what.  But seeing as how they look all right, I can’t be arsed to track that particular formatting anomaly down; I would be at it all week and it simply would not be worth it.

The best thing, however, is finding out how Amazon Kindle deals with having two books on the site with exactly the same name and exactly the same cover.

My publisher told me they had “unpublished” the book, but you can still find a Lulu version of the book I removed from publication back in 2007, so I don’t expect their version to go away anytime soon.  I am merely hoping my readers are smart enough to purchase the $0.99 version (which retails for $1.59) instead of the $9.89 version.  Otherwise, they are identical, except the new one has more reviews.

Two books, same name, different price--pick the better value

For some reason, Amazon has put all but one of the reviews gathered on the old version of the book onto the new one.  I am truly grateful for that, but I can’t think of how that might have happened, or why, if they did move them, they didn’t move them all.

Like the rogue font, however, it doesn’t merit looking into; it’s better just to accept it and move on.

Posted in Self-Publishing | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Feel Like a Writer

Six PDF files, Four graphics, four days, three formats and two books.  It’s been a hectic weekend (yes, my weekends are four days long; jealous?) but I have both my books – Postcards and Son of Postcards – revamped, re-priced and republished on Amazon, Kindle and Smashwords.  (But don’t tell anyone, it’s a secret; I’m not announcing the re-release until 1 March.)

Materially, it’s been the most productive few days I can remember in a long time.  So why don’t I feel like a writer?

Probably because I haven’t actually written anything.  In fact, I haven’t written anything substantial since Christmas Day when I finished up the final draft of my Ireland book.  That’s a long time for someone like me to be doing nothing but the occasional post and researching Spiritualism and Home Schooling in the UK.

Somehow, no matter how much time I put in doing writer-type things, unless I end the day with some new words created on virtual paper, I feel like a guy who used to write, not like a writer.

When I get to the end of a major work, I feel really good for about two days, then I start looking at my writing log and noticing there are no Words Per Day adding up and I start thinking that maybe I should write something, anything, just to keep the momentum going.

But I can’t simpy jump into a novel; I’m one of those people who research a novel to death and then make a detailed outline that falls apart after the third chapter.  So I research and try to convince myself that, yes, it actually is writing, of a sort, even if it doesn’t involve tapping keys and watching words accumulate.

All this formatting work may be behind me, but very soon I will begin production work on the Ireland book, so I know it will be some time before I can even get back to the non-writing work of researching the next novel.

I’ll get over it; especially when the proof copies of the books arrive and I can hold them in my hands and oh and ah over them.  Then I’ll feel like a writer again, for a couple of days, at least.

Posted in General Randomness, Self-Publishing | Leave a comment

Why I am…am not…am Self Publishing

Life is not a static thing.   The only people who do not change their minds are incompetents in asylums, and those in cemeteries.   - Everett McKinley Dirksen

As you may know, I am no fan of self-publishing.  A lot of that has to do with the prejudices and the aspirations I have been holding on to since childhood.  Self-publishing, to me, means you have given up.  You can’t cut the mustard so you are going to foist a steaming pile of prose on the public; real writers find real publishers, at least in my world they do (that would be the world where the family all gathers ‘round the dining room table for dinner and then retires to the sitting room for a rousing game of Parcheesi and hot cocoa with marshmallows).

And yet I fell for it.  The businessman in me knew it was a mistake, my publisher urged me not to, but the geek in me was keen to try out all those whizzy new gadgets available on Createspace and Kindle Direct Publishing.  And you know what?  It was a hoot!  I put in the hours to create a good cover, had the good fortune to have the manuscript read and corrected by some very talented people and I enjoyed the technical jobs of formatting and uploading immensely.  I was (and remain) proud of the final product.

But it was a self-published book.  And despite the respectability self-publication is supposedly earning, all I got was a rolling of the eyes and a “Oh, so it’s SELF-published…I see” from the people I admitted it to, and a literal “Don’t call us, we’ll call you” from the proprietor of my local bookstore, the same woman who had been very receptive of my first, properly published book.

And then, of course, there was the marketing.  Big FAIL.

So when it came time to publish the final Postcards book, I decided I wanted to go with my publisher.  The big reason for that is, they had my original one and I wanted all the books under one banner.  I figured if got book number 3 published there, they might take book number 2, as well.  I would lose control of the manuscripts, have no say about the covers or the lay out or the pricing and have to settle for a percentage of whatever the publisher’s take was, but I was willing to go with that in exchange for the marketing assistance they could provide.

Long story short, my publisher and I could not reach an equitable agreement, and at least a portion of the blame lay in the fact that I had self-published my previous book and I knew I didn’t have to settle for a bad deal.  The downside to self-publishing might have been the eye-rolling, the “So it’s a piece of shit” looks from people who would never know and being treated like a red-headed step-child by the proprietor of the local bookstore, but the downside of being “published” would be the loss of control over the manuscript and a paltry return.

So I’m back in the Indie business.  You’ll be hearing more about this adventure in self-publishing in the weeks to come, and hopefully I’ll get to grips with marketing a little better this time around.

STOP THE PRESS!!!

I wrote the above on the bus coming home.  When I got home I had a message from my original publisher* waiting: they were discontinuing the expat book line and had returned all rights to the manuscript to me.  So now all three books can be put under my own banner.  If I had accepted the publisher’s offer, I would be banging my head on the table right now.

The self-publishing gods must be smiling.

*My publisher and the original publisher are essentially the same outfit, but with mergers and acquisitions it all got a bit confusing.

Posted in Self-Publishing | Tagged | 7 Comments

Time For a Change

I was going to use the excuse of my upcoming Tin Jubilee Celebration as a reason for changing the blog yet again, but the truth is I always hated the original design and have been looking for an acceptable replacement since I first put the blog up.  WordPress, however, has not made it easy.

The reason I hated the old blog theme—which was Bueno—was first and foremost because I couldn’t fit the title of my blog in it:

Add to that the fact that each graphic was surrounded with a clunky, gaudy boarder and that the entire look of the blog was rather stodgy, and you’ll understand why I started looking for a substitute almost immediately.

I decided to give WordPress another try after my first disastrous attempt some years back because every blog I ever saw that I liked the look of was, without exception, a WordPress blog.  So in June 2011 I made the switch only to find the world of WordPress was not as benign as Blogger.  The first thing I came to realize was that a free WordPress blog is not, in fact, free.

Any decent looking theme is a premium theme, meaning you need to buy it.  But even the free blogs come with a price tag attached.  If you find a free theme and check out the options it comes with, then switch to it, you often find that the advertized options only become available if you pay a fee.  Now, I don’t mind paying for something, but in WordPress, you don’t actually buy anything, you merely rent it, so a $60 tag for the ability to change the colors on your blog is not something you pay for now and enjoy for the life of your blog, it is a fee that eats into your disposable income year after year.

But that’s not all; want to embed video from YouTube (something I can do in Blogger for free), then cough up another $60 a year.  Want a redirect (something I can do in Blogger for free), that will be $12 a year.  Want a blog with no ads (something you get in Blogger for free) that’s another $30 a year.  Pretty soon, especially if you have a variety of blog like I do, you’re talking real money.  Every year.

And so I finally found Coraline, a clean, simple design that is 100% free.  It should be, all it offers is black text on a white background and the ability to change the header photo.  I suspect the photo option will soon be moved into the fee area, and I’ll be hit with a $45 a year fee if I want to alter the header, but for now I’m happy.

At the very least, I am finally able to put the entire title of my blog on my blog, which I shouldn’t think is too much to ask.

Posted in General Randomness | Tagged , | 3 Comments

A Fresh Stop

2011 has been a great year for me.  I have a good, solid novel manuscript in the hands of a terrific agent, I have recently finished the manuscript for Postcards From Ireland and, In June, I self-published More Postcards From Across the Pond, just to see if I could do it.  To accomplish this latter feat, I read Catherine Ryan Howard’s fine book, Self Printed and followed the model therein.

The results were most pleasing; it is a great looking book and has received great reviews, most of which called it better than the original, which was professionally published.  That was gratifying, but overall it is an experience I hope never to repeat.

I have talked before about my method for becoming successful at something; namely, find someone who is successfully doing what you want to do and do what they are doing.  I have done this over the years with good results, and I thought I was on to something when I began following Catherine’s blueprint.  But when it was over, I realized I was following the path for being a successful entrepreneur when I actually wanted to be a successful writer.

Now, being a successful entrepreneur is all well and good, and to be a successful writer, you have to have a little of that entrepreneurial spirit in you, but if your goal is to be a published writer, which is what mine is, then you need to follow the examples of other published writers.  Whether they have the entrepreneurial spirit or not, I expect Stephen King and Janet Evanovich enter “Writer” in the “What is your occupation” box, not “Entrepreneur.”

So I have singled out one or two writers (not Stephen or Janet) who I would like to emulate and have, as a sort of 2012 New Year’s Resolution, proposed to follow their methodology.

Here are some commonalities I have found among the professional, published writers I have chosen as templates for success:

  1. They don’t tend to blog about writing.  Instead, they write.  Their blog, if they have one, is to keep their fans up to speed on their latest work/appearances/successes, not to talk (or obsess) about how/why/when they write.
  2. They don’t write for free.  A guest post on a blog, sure, but a steady gig in an on-line (for profit) magazine that pays you in “exposure,” no.
  3. They write, they ask for peer review, they rewrite, they revise, they edit, they submit, and start again.
  4. They don’t self-publish; that would make them self-published writers, not published writers, and that is what I am aiming for.

I am not saying I’ll never self-publish again—I expect I will—but I’m just saying I don’t want to, not at this point.  I wish all the self-publishers the best of luck, but I’m going to follow the points listed above, and go on searching for a publisher.

Wishing you a happy, prosperous and published 2012.

Happy 2012

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Reality Check: The Rise of Vanities

Just a quick post to clear up a bit of confusion that seems to be distracting some writer/publishers lately:

PUBLISHING MODELS:

TRADITIONAL PUBLISHING: Money to Author
VANITY PRESS: Money from Author

If money goes FROM the author TO the publisher IN ANY WAY, that publisher is a VANITY PRESS.

I say this because a lot of agents and small presses and – with the Penguin Group leading the way – even mainstream publishers are scrambling for a piece of the self-publishing pie by offering “services” to would-be authors in exchange for publishing their books.  That makes them VANITY PRESSES.

Period.

Full Stop.

No Argument.

“But we offer services that will benefit the entrepreneur author in ways…”

“Ah ah ah.  Do you take money from the author in exchange for publishing their books?

“We charge for services, just like any business…”

“And an independent author can buy them, or not, from anyone and then publish their book as they see fit; but do YOU charge for these services as part of a publication package.”

“Our pricing policy is one that…”

“Ah ah ah!  Do you take money from the author in exchange for publishing their books?”

“Well, it’s not as simple as that…”

“Yes, it is.  Do you, or do you not take money from authors?”

“Okay, yes, we do.  Bu it’s…”

“No buts.  You are a VANITY PRESS.  Live with it.”

Just wanted to clear that up.

Posted in General Randomness | Tagged | 6 Comments

Writing at the Speed of Thought

I mentioned this blog post (How I Went From Writing 2000 Words a Day to 10,00 Words a Day) by Rachel Aaron in my last entry, but I wanted to explore the idea of writing fast a little further.

I write slow.  And like writers who outline versus those who fly by the seat of their pants, I think speed is something specific to individual writers: you are either fast, or not.  That said, I think we all have the ability to write faster, to a point, but no matter how good I get at slinging words on a page, I doubt I will ever attain 10,000 words a day that Rachel has.  I am just not made that way.

Writing fast is a relatively new concept to me.  Up until a few years ago I thought all writers took a year or so—or at least a few months—to write a novel, but then Joe Konrath noted that he wrote his books rather quickly.  This surprised me, and I took it be an anomaly.  But then Dean Wesley Smith startled me with the admonition that there was no excuse for not writing three novels a year.  His math was infallible: 1,000 words a day equals a 90,000 word novel every three months, leaving a month to revise and edit each one.  This model should give anyone ample time to write three novels a year, especially when he insists that the 1,000 words should only take you an hour, leaving the rest of the day to plot, plan and procrastinate as you see fit.

Dean’s wife, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, in her book The Freelancer’s Survival Guide, also recommends the 1,000 words an hour rate, but—and here is where it falls apart for me—she advocates doing this for hour after hour.  The basis of the blog post by Rachel, “How I Went From Writing 2,000 Words a Day to 10,000 Words a Day,” centers around that same idea: write fast, then write faster, and do it consistently.

I can, and do, write at the rate of 1,000 words an hour.  Much of my writing is done on the bus commuting to and from work, a trip of, coincidentally, one hour each way.  And in each of those hours, I generally produce about 1,000 words.  So that’s 6,000 words in three days, if I’m feeling inspired and I manage to get a seat.  I do not write that fast during my “writing at home” days, however, for two reasons:

Mainly, I don’t feel the pressure.  When my stop is coming up and I am in the middle of a thought, the words flow fast and free, but when I can wander into the kitchen and make myself a cup of coffee, or enjoy the sunshine out on the balcony with a beverage and a cigar, my daily quota tends to slip.

Dilly-dallying, however, can be overcome with a bit of discipline or a hard deadline, unlike the other reason I don’t write 1,000 words an hour on a continual basis: I lack the stamina.

Banging out between 5 and 6,000 characters on a keyboard every hour amounts to one and a half keystrokes every second, second after second after second for 21,600 seconds in a modest, 6-hour day.  Granted, at the end of that time, you’d have 6,000 words but, in my case (and in many people’s, I suspect) after the first 90 minutes the words wulod lok smoetinhg like tish and, if not totally unintelligible, would read like total shite.

Add to that the fact that I would probably have had a nervous breakdown after hour three and you’ll understand why I am not now, nor ever expect to try, shooting for 10,000 words a day.

But I encourage you, if you want to increase your output, to have a read of Rachel Aaron’s article.  Just don’t kill yourself trying for the impossible.  As for myself, I think I’ll stick with my humble, but manageable 1,000 words a day and count any extra I do as gravy.  As Dean Wesley Smith points out, that’s three novels a year, and that’s a number I can live with.

(This blog post contains 684 words and it took me just over half an hour to type it, and that included going into the kitchen to make a cup of coffee.)

Posted in General Randomness, Writing | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

The End — Finally Finishing My WIP

At long last, I have typed THE END on the final page of Postcards From Ireland.  It has not been fun.

I find this very strange, because this was a memoir, an amusing romp into a very pleasant time in my past, it should have practically written itself.  But it didn’t.  To steal a phrase from Meg Gardiner, it was like pulling my own teeth: slow, painful and messy.  Every sentence was agony.

And when I say I have finished, I don’t mean the first draft.  A first draft to me is when you can read the manuscript from beginning to end without bumping into the notes I leave behind, like breadcrumbs on an unfamiliar trail:

-          TK: is this how you spell Cladda?

-          TK: check this for accuracy; Wikipedia isn’t always right

-          TK: this paragraph is shite; fix it!  I don’t care how, just do it!

-          TK: Insert the hippopotamus story here

So I still need to go over the manuscript, rewrite it and fill in all the gaps before I can actually call it the first draft; what I possess now is a rough draft and fervent hopes that the future work goes faster and is less painful.

The hows and the whys of the difficultly are no longer important; all I care about is that it is behind me and that it is not normal.  I finished my previous novel in 88 days with a final word count of 93,000 words, but I have been kicking this book around for 262 days and only managed 44,000 words (for those of you keeping score, that s about 167 words a day).  Granted, I complied and published More Postcards From Across the Pond and rewrote my novel to my agent’s specifications during that time, so I wasn’t completely slacking off, but still, that is an appallingly long time for such a paltry output.

If I’d been following Rachel Aaron’s method of producing 10k words a day, I would have had it done in less than a week.

(By the way, Rachel’s claim is not an empty boast, it’s a step-by-step, achievable method.  Well worth a look.)

I don’t think I’m quite ready for 10k a day—I’m far too disorganized and I have an amazing talent for frittering away time—but I’d better step up the pace on the revisions and the rewrites or my “10-Year Anniversary” book won’t be out until my 20th.

Posted in Writing | Leave a comment

Size Does Matter

I moved again. Not from one flat to another, or to another blog, but to a different PC, and I’m a bit knackered by the effort. Strange how each of those occasions seems to require the same amount of time, tenacity and heartache. Granted, the latter two don’t involve lugging a sofa up and down several flights of stairs, but in some cases I think that might be preferable.

The move came about due to a miscalculation I made two years ago.

When I first came to England, I was writing on an AlphaSmart, but after a while I longed for a laptop, so when I began carrying one around for work, I put all my files on it. The problem with that was, when I was unable to get a front seat on the bus, I was unable to open it up and had to spend the trip just staring out the window. This became a pressing problem when a sudden surge of people began riding the bus. Usually, I was the only person on when I boarded, but over time more and more people appeared. And they all sat in the front seats.

My brainstorm was to buy a mini-laptop that I could open even if I was sitting in one of the regular seats.

It seemed the perfect solution, so I bought an Acer netbook over the 2009 Christmas holidays—a sort of belated gift to myself—and spent several days configuring it. Then two things happed simultaneously when I went back to work: first, the people disappeared, then they brought in a new style of bus that had a much roomier front area containing as many as eleven seats I could use that had no seat in front of them. But I had bought the netbook, so I was going to use it, dammit.

Acer Vs a full sized Dell

It wasn’t a bad little PC; it was light and as easy to carry as a hardcover book and had all the power I needed to write, manipulate photographs and manage my website, but it had a tiny little screen. Working is such a confined viewing area made my life difficult. My spreadsheets wouldn’t fit, photos looked too large and the area I had to write in was limited. Also, when handling my e-mail, the Yahoo page header, e-mail header and all the other shit Yahoo throws at you made the text area of the e-mail so small I could only see a few lines.

To top that off, the cruelest irony of all occurred when I did have to sit in a regular seat, where I discovered that the laptop, small though it was, still could not be opened without bumping into the seat in front of me: the entire reason I purchased it was based on a fallacy. Writing on it was not impossible, but it was very difficult indeed. Still, I bought the damn thing, so I was going to use it.

But this week I figured two years was enough, so I spent the last couple of days configuring everything back to my work laptop. And unlike last time, I created a second user account so my business self could log in and get all my work stuff and my writing self could keep the writing area free of distracting clutter (sometimes working on a client specification is preferable to tackling the next chapter in the novel).

So far, it’s working a treat, but the time-suck has been amazing. No matter how many times I do this, it never gets any easier.

Now you just know that when I go back to work next week a whole gang of people will be on the bus taking up all of the front seats.

Posted in General Randomness | 2 Comments

Back to Work

Yes, it has been three full weeks since I have written anything. Well, anything much.  I put a post up on my main website—a throw-away post which, for some unknown reason, garnered 10 times the usual amount of traffic—and continued my weekly 450 words for Pond Parleys, because that is an obligation I take seriously.  But otherwise, nothing.

Instead I read, surfed writing blogs, visited Kew Gardens, researched, exchanged a few e-mails with my agent, played Pooh Sticks on the actual Pooh Bridge in the Hundred Acre Wood, went to a book festival, toured a bird sanctuary, had a brief but illuminating conversation with Meg Gardiner, bought my wife a Kindle for Christmas (don’t worry, she doesn’t read this blog) and thought a lot about my writing career.

After weighing all the facts at my disposal and checking all the angles available to me, I have decided, once and for all (and for now), that self-publishing is not a path I want to pursue.

I don’t regret my recent detour; the result was a champion book that looks, feels and reads like a “real” book.  And despite my claims about low sales, when compared to the other 99.9% of self-published books out there (the ones not cranked out by the self-pub prophets), my sales were actually above average.  So I have nothing to be ashamed of.  I just don’t want to do it again.

This also does not mean that self-publishing is not what you should do: this is a highly individual decision.  Go make your own.

Having been distracted by the bright and shiny baubles that we writers now have at our disposal, I am back with the basics, back to the only thing that ever did matter and ever will matter to a writer—you and your manuscript in cage, fighting it out to the death.

You can have all the electronic wizardry, spelling and grammar checkers, formatting, PhotoShopping, One-Stop publishing and direct marketing programs you like, but in the end, if you haven’t wrestled you manuscript to the ground and made it submit, you have nothing to work with.

So, having ignored my work in progress for nearly a month, I walked back into the cage with it this morning.  Turning your back on it is never a good thing, as it grows in your mind to something terrible and fearsome, but when I sat down and opened the document, the fear subsided, and the beast rolled onto its back and let me rub its belly.

There is nowhere to go now but forward.

Posted in General Randomness | Leave a comment

I Quit

Yeah, I quit writing again.  Don’t get too excited; I got better (I’m writing this, aren’t I?)

I quit writing the way a lot of people quit smoking: I argue with myself, dwell on the downsides of continuing, beguile myself with fantasies about all the money and time I will save by quitting, then stop cold turkey, only to find myself, a few nights later, standing in the drizzle in back of the pub sucking on a fag.  (That probably didn’t sound right to my American readers; that’s just British English for smoking a cigarette.)

No Writing

And quitting, from time to time, is a good thing. It allows me time to think, it lets me step back and have a good look at what I’m doing and where I’m going.  And, occasionally, it seems to trigger some amazing events.

During the bulk of my life—while I was raising children, getting divorced and entangling myself in a series of ill-advised relationships—I never quit writing, I simply ignored it for long periods of time.  I always considered myself a writer, however, and always knew I would get back to it.  One day.  But despite sporadic success, I was never really able to totally pull myself together.

Then I became an expat.  And happily married.  This sudden infusion of calm into my life allowed me, for the first time, to really settle down and treat my writing seriously.  So I wrote articles, researched markets, submitted and got rejections.  After a year or so of that, I wrote a novel and got an agent but never a publisher.  Then I lost the agent.

After nearly four years of achieving no concrete success, I read a blog post that laid out some solid guidelines for people thinking of being writers.  Basically, it told you all the things you should do, but ended by saying that, if you haven’t made any money after four years, maybe you should think about going into another line of work.  I thought that was good advice, and determined to follow it.  As the end of my fourth writing year drew to a close, I genuinely committed myself to this.  It was the first time in my life I seriously, calmly and rationally considered just stopping.

No Writing

Then something happened—the type of thing that, if you put it in a novel, no one would believe it.  On the evening of my last day, just before I went to bed, I checked my e-mail and found a letter from the editor of a writing web site.  She wanted to buy one of my articles.  For $5.  It wasn’t much, but it threw my dreams of having excess time out the window.

Some years later, after a stint of selling articles to various websites only to have them all dry up and finding nothing to replace them, and finding myself with another novel no one wanted, I once again took stock of my writing life and decided it was not worth continuing.  This was another rational, well thought out plan that I was honestly committed to.  I remember sitting on the balcony, finishing my cigar and making the final decision; it was over, it was done, and it felt right.  I went back inside, checked my e-mail and had another one of those “this could never happen in real life” things happen: I found a letter from an agent who had read my blog, liked my stuff and wanted to know if I had any novels lying around she might be interested in.

Naturally, I was dubious, but she checked out (very well, I might add) and liked my first novel enough to ask for my second (not enough to represent it, mind).  My second is still with her, on its second viewing.  My fingers and toes are crossed.

And, of course, I’m still writing.  Or I was, until this past weekend.  The impetus for this decision was nothing rational or thought out, however, it was a web site.

Lately, because I am reminded I have two books out there that could do with some readership, I have been spending a staggering amount of time pimping myself on social media.  It then belatedly occurred to me that this was doing little good because my social media footprint is very, very small.  So I began spending even more staggering amounts of time attempting to gain Twit-mates.  And that, incredibly, worked.  I saw my followers rise—albeit very slowly—from two-digit numbers, into three.  I was a long way off of four-digit numbers, but I was at last seeing some progress and felt confident that, as long as I continued to devote a staggering amount of time to it, I would succeed.

No Writing

I wasn’t getting much writing done during this time, and I was falling further and further behind on my deadlines but, hey, I was making progress.  Then I clicked on a link I thought would lead me to an article on how to build Twitter followers.  Instead it brought me to a website where I could buy them.

I stopped and gaped at the page (I admit to being terrible naïve here; this is hardly a new phenomenon, but it was new to me) and felt the earth give way beneath me.  As I took in all the pricing bands for purchasing Twitter followers, Facebook friends and even youTube viewers, I felt, not my will to write, but the very will to live, drain from me.  I know this seems an over-reaction but, coupled with everything else that was going on, and all the time and effort I was spending on social networking, finding out I could buy friends made me lose all hope in humanity.

So I walked away.

Over the next few days, I caught up on some reading, which was very enjoyable, told my wife I was quitting writing (she didn’t believe me, either) and not-so-secretly hoped for another “couldn’t happen in real life” happening.  None came.  But last night, as I was having my postprandial cigar, I started thinking about my idle novel, and what I might do with it, and how I could get back on track with my current work in progress, and about some other article ideas I had been kicking around.

So no major event this time, just a quiet reminder that, like it or not, I am a writer, and I cannot quit, and that was enough.  Still, a call from Random House would have been nice.

Posted in General Randomness | 4 Comments